Recent demonstrations in public spaces of our cities are confirming a profound crisis of political institutions worldwide. While citizens are claiming a change in national political agendas to ask for more focus on their own everyday life concerns and less on global finances, public squares are emerging as places of political discussion. Moved by this contemporary interest, Intermediate Unit 8 have worked on redefining what constitutes a public space today, which is the role of the architect and the agency of people, and how innovation on fabrication methods might serve as fundamental tools for constructing a city of the commons.
This year the work of the unit has been located in the city of Mexico, a metropolis developed under neoliberal rules for the last two decades. The particular site for the unit work has been the massive modernist housing complex of Tlatelolco, and more specifically, the Plaza de las Tres Culturas. This urban square is well known not only for the mixed presence of Aztec, Spanish Colonial and Modernist constructions, but also for its past political life including the students’ massacre before 1968 Olympic Games. Based on a confrontation with the everyday life in the city, students have researched on the most “mundane” contemporary issues, including insecurity, informal economy, drug cartels, social segregation or cultural repression. These issues are the ones employed as alternative micro-agendas to inform the public space of today. After intense research and reflection on the realities of the city, students have proposed different material and programmatic tactics, reflecting on how traditional construction methods can be used to generate new fabrication techniques in which citizens have a more active role. Therefore, social participation and public action are considered a fundamental part in the definition of new political spaces as an endless process of contestation, negotiation and transformation.
15.10.11
W4 - Tutorials
11.00 Erez
11.30 Elliot
12.00 Anand
12.30 Camille
13.00 Fragkiskos
14.00 Andreas
14.30 Enrique
15.00 Frederique
15.30 Hao Wen
16.00 Andrew
16.30 Eleni
17.00 Carlotta
18.00 Movie Amores Perros
Please be on time with your drawings and work about your issues. 4A2 minimum.
Suggested readings
Michael De Certeau: The practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1984. Part three- Spatial Practices. Chapter 7. Walk in the city
Henri Lefebvre: Critique of Everyday Life, London: Verso, 1991.
12.10.11
W3 - Tutorials
10.00 Frederique
10.30 Eleni
11.00 Hao Wen
11.30 Camille
12.00 Fragkiskos
12.30 Carlotta
14.00 Anand
14.30 Andreas
15.00 Erez
15.30 Andrew
16.00 Elliot
16.30 Enrique
17.00 Lecture by Adam Kaasa (information in previous post)
Please be on time for the tutorials with your drawings and the topic selected.
8.10.11
W3-Lecture: ‘The Architecture of Citizenship: Mexico City in the 20th Century’ by Adam Kaasa
W3 Presentations & Lecture

7.10.11
W3-4 ISSUE: FINDING OUT ABOUT URBAN CULTURES: WAYS OF LIVING
The work starts with a series of explorations about everyday life issues in groups of two from a list that we will suggest you. Continuining with individual researches that will be presented on Friday 21st of October.
Readings
Bruno Latour, Reassembling the social, An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005
Hannah Arendt, “The Public and the Private Realm”, in The Human Condition, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1998, pp.22-78
Hannah Arendt, “Introduction into politics”, in The Promise of Politics, Schoken Books: New York 2005, pp. 93-200
YIMING HUANG (3RD YEAR)
W2-8 REASSESSING DISCIPLINARY TOOLS
5.10.11
W2 Jury - Workshop on Immediate Governance
3.10.11
W2 Tutorials_2
30.9.11
W2 Tutorials
28.9.11
W2 IMMEDIATE GOVERNANCE: WINDOWS, DOORS, AND TRANSITS
Seminar “Reassessing the immediate: Doors & Windows” by Francisco Gonzalez de Canales.
Suggested Readings Robin Evans, “Figures, Doors and Passages” in Translations from drawings to building and other essays, London: AA Publications, 1997, pp. 55-91. Bruno Reichlin, “The Pros and Cons of the Horizontal Window: The Perret-Le Corbusier Controversy”, in Daidalos 13, 1984, pp. 65-78.






